COMMUNITARIANISM - THE DICTATORSHIP OF EVERYTHING
COMMUNITARIANISM - THE DICTATORSHIP OF EVERYTHING
by Nancy Levant - January 2, 2007 - NewsWithViews.com
Let
us start with the premise the title offers. Let us assume that our
Constitution and three branches of government, our state constitutions
and governors, our schools and universities, our health care systems,
taxation systems, all regional and appointed governing bodies, commissions,
and councils; our churches and synagogues, our military, land and
watershed systems, and all forms of licensure and credentialing, including
travel, are under the governing auspices of internationally emerging
laws. Then let us try to figure out what is not under global dictatorship
specifically here in the United States.
We
still have our 2nd Amendment intact, though it has been degraded decade
by decade, and the United Nations is in the planning stages of disarming
the “international community.” By “international community,” let us
assume that means the international rabble. I’m pretty sure the elite
will still have their armed body-guarding details and that the “international”
peacekeeping forces will remain technologically armed to the teeth
and into outer space. Let us also assume that non-lethal weapons technologies
will also remain highly funded and manufactured. Let us therefore
assume that total disarmament of other than elites and militaries
remains a global governing plan of action. In other words, our 2nd
Amendment is hanging on by a shred of a thread.
Let
us also assume that all current and pending legislation is of Communitarian
flavor and has been since the early 1970’s. Communitarian law functions
in Europe as the governmental structure and bureaucracy of the European
Union. As the North American Union continues to materialize not so
secretly, we can also assume that Communitarian law is also intended
to replace Constitutional law. One-world government, after all, means
ONE government.
From
Niki Raapana’s
essay titled: What is Communitarian Law?, the following quote:
“Communitarian
Law is the new legal system used by regional and local governments
affiliated with the emerging global government. This new law circumvents
national law via a program of "balancing," often implemented by a
small group of self-appointed elites who achieve consensus (not voting).
For Americans, the adoption of these evolving principles transports
us from a constitutional system where we expect clearly defined basic
rights (like due process and legal searches) to a more moral way of
enforcing "social justice" that only a few upper level academics can
define. Communitarian law is the precedent that requires the courts
to rule in favor of the self-defined "community" against individuals
protected by constitutional law. It limits the property rights of
individuals in all member nations. The most obvious current communitarian
decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court is Kelo v. The City
of New London, a land rights case that balanced property rights against
communitarian development goals. The least obvious communitarian decision
handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court is Hiibel v. The State of Nevada,
a privacy rights case that balanced private individual's right to
anonymity. In all U.S. communitarian legislation and criminal code,
the stated purpose is to balance individual rights against community
responsibilities. It's called Reinventing Government. Based on the
consensus reached by globalist do-gooders, all nations are now required
to adjust their national systems. The world is in an ongoing process
of internal re-inventions of national political and legal infrastructures.”
Also
from Niki
Raapana:
“Communitarian Law is a top-down system:
-
International Communitarian Law, enforced by international courts
of justice.
- Regional Communitarian Law, enforced by regional parliaments.
- Local Communitarian Law, enforced by Community Development
Public-Private Partnerships and LA-21 Plans.
The
communitarian philosophy-ideology is what supports the emerging supranational
government body. The system integrates all nations of the world into
sub-regions. Each region has its own code of communitarian law in
addition to mandatory inclusion of higher global laws. Each nation
has their own proposed process for national subordination to the regional
and international supreme authoritative bodies. In Europe and Latin
America the national modification and subordination process is published
in all documents relating to communitarian integration. In Europe
they have a collection of communitarian environmental case law (with
E Law being one of the first global scale tests of the new law). In
the United States it can never be disclosed to the average voter;
for officials to speak openly of treason is a criminal offense (http://nord.twu.net/acl).”
It
is increasingly difficult to explain to a refusing public the truth
about America’s future and demise. I make the strongest recommendation
to fully explore the Anti-Communitarian League website offered above.
To understand what has happened in the U.S., as well as to the rest
of the world, one must understand the replacement government that
has been implemented by the global or one-world system. To even begin
to fathom America coming under the governmental control of another
court and system of justice, one must fully comprehend the fact that
1) this new form of government exists and operates in many other parts
of the world as we speak, and 2) it has already been illegally implemented
on the homeland. We the people are NOT driving the wagon – period.
And, remarkably, we still don’t realize that this new government is
operational in every state in this nation (see “Regional” government).
Communitarian
Law is not a conspiracy theory. It is practiced and taught in most
law schools in Europe as the primary system of governance. Communitarian
Law is also an operational fact of daily life in the U.S.
And
the bottom line is this: Communitarian Law eliminates ALL rights of
individuals for 1) the common good, and 2) for the “security” of the
global governing elite - nothing more – nothing less. It sets up a
2-class system of governors and the governed, or in simplified terms,
the rich overlords and the rabble. Communitarianism is high-tech Communism.
Consider
ourselves lucky to be living in the most frightening and fascinating
time in American history. We are experiencing the exact moment in
time where America stands or permanently falls to pure and unadulterated
treason and betrayal by the elected. With a whole lot of us and a
smidgeon of them, we have to make the determination as to the kind
of lives we choose to live. Today, and as we speak, you must decided
for yourselves if you want freedom or to be totally, 100% controlled
and managed people. A middle ground does not exist. It’s all for freedom
or all for one-world governance by elimination of ALL individual (meaning
constitutional) rights.
So,
here is what we are free to do. Tell the truth, expect the truth,
and stand up for freedom for mankind. Hurry, America. In one voice,
the American people must scream to Washington D.C. and to their state
capitols that we will not stand by and allow our freedom and our sovereign
nation to fall to THEIR custom-made, hand-crafted technological government.
We must defend our constitutional rights and our nation. Communitarianism
is not about “the common good,” people. It’s about power and the absolute
and dictatorial control of money and people – nothing more and nothing
less. America’s future and continuing history falls on our shoulders.
WE have to tell the traitors in office “NO” before the next “crisis”
strikes our nation. Once martial law is declared, the “new world”
begins in earnest, and it is highly unlikely that American troops
will be here to enforce martial law. Clearly, “peacekeeping” forces
will have to be deployed to our homeland, as our military is clearly
not coming home. You better wake up, America. We are running out of
words to help you to see reality. We are also running out of time.
PageTOP ^
Disclaimer
CAFTA, THE EU & COMMUNITARIAN LAW
CAFTA, THE EU & COMMUNITARIAN LAW
by Niki Raapana
January
25, 2006 - NewsWithViews.com
How both parties sold America down the river
After
wading through all the publications and websites representing both support
and opposition for the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-approved
by the U.S. Congress July 2005), it's astonishing to realize how very
few of them bother to explain the legal foundation for the agreement.
CAFTA, like most international trade agreements, is based entirely in
the supremacy of communitarian law.
This
isn't Bush and Clinton quietly slipping in communitarian programs like
Local Agenda 21 that bury communitarian laws deep inside hefty grants
and incentives. The U.S. Congress has officially denounced their own Constitution
as Supreme Law. When the United States Congress approved CAFTA they endorsed
a regional trade agreement that places U.S. Constitutional Law below
Communitarian Law. While communitarian law is without a doubt the most
important legal topic in the world, American experts on both "sides" of
the free trade arguments completely ignore it. Consequently, it's the
rare American who has any concept of how prevalent or powerful this new
system of justice is.
The
European Court of Justice is occassionally referred to as the Communitarian
Court of Justice. CAFTA officials openly discuss using the EU as their
model for communitarian case law. Communitarian Regulations govern the
archiving of EU legal documents. The term communitarian law is in hundreds
of online law journals. It's taught in several foreign law schools and
there are degreed law professors of Communitarian Law. The Jean Monet
program sponsors symposiums on it at U.S. universities. The D.C. Communitarian
Network sends out a communitarian law newsletter. It's a widely understood
term in Europe, Central, and South America. Still, Communitarian Law is
so unfamiliar to U.S. Americans (and their attorneys) that most have never
once heard the terms used.
One
reason for its obscurity comes from the fact that communitarian law is
also called Community Law, community aquis, and aquis communitaire. But
another reason for its obscurity is the simple fact that globalists don't
want our people to know anything about it. The European Constitution
was defeated at the polls by the Dutch and the French voters because of
its supremacy of communitarian law. The last thing the communitarian supra-nationalists
want to happen is for all of America to learn the whole truth about communitarian
"free trade." Remember, universities in England, Spain, Portugal, and
Romania offer coursework and masters programs in Communitarian Law. Only
a few elite American universities offer courses in communitarian law,
and barely a handful of American students have ever studied it.
The
vice-president of the EU Constitutional Convention sums it up nicely:
"One must act
'as if' in Europe: as if one wanted only very few things, in order
to obtain a great deal. As if nations were to remain sovereign, in
order to convince them to surrender their sovereignty. The Commission
in Brussels, for example, must act as if it were a technical organism,
in order to operate like a government ... and so on, camouflaging
and toning down. The sovereignty lost at national level does not pass
to any new subject. It is entrusted to a faceless entity: NATO, the
UN and eventually the EU. The Union is the vanguard of this changing
world: it indicates a future of Princes without sovereignty. The new
entity is faceless and those who are in command can neither be pinned
down nor elected ... That is the way Europe was made too: by creating
communitarian organisms without giving the organisms presided over
by national governments the impression that they were being subjected
to a higher power.
That is how the
Court of Justice as a supra-national organ was born. It was a sort
of unseen atom bomb, which Schuman and Monnet slipped into the negotiations
on the Coal and Steel Community. That was what the 'CSC' itself was:
a random mixture of national egotisms which became communitarian.
I don't think it is a good idea to replace this slow and effective
method - which keeps national States free from anxiety while they
are being stripped of power - with great institutional leaps - Therefore
I prefer to go slowly, to crumble pieces of sovereignty up litle by
little, avoiding brusque transitions from national to federal power.
That is the way I think we will have to build Europe's common policies..."
-
Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato, later Vice-President of the EU
Constitutional Convention, interview with Barbara Spinelli, La Stampa,
13 July 2000. Posted in a great list of quotes compiled by Free
Europe Blog.
How
is it possible that Americans, with their "free press" and literate population
are completely unfamiliar with the term communitarian law? The problem
appears to be a constitutional issue over the definition of treason. Communitarian
law is designed to over-rule all national law, including the U.S. Constitution
and Bill of Rights. Why do so many Americans flat out refuse to consider
the possibility that current events resulting in federal legislation and
Executive Orders are related? Communitarian laws balance individual
rights against "safety" (as do the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security
Act). This shows a pattern of thought, doesn't it? Part of the problem
is the American people don't believe there are any more Hitlers or Stalins.
They
believe communism "died" in the eighties, and that former evil colonial
rulers all magically, spiritually evolved into nice, kind "helpers."
This amazing under-education promotes such a naive approach to modern
politics that admitting the unknown is almost impossible for them. Indeed,
many prefer to "shoot the messenger" rather than admit they somehow missed
the most important legal development of the 20th century. The fact is,
communitarian law and philosophy are so well hidden from the American
people that many have accused this author of making the terms up as a
part of my own personal "conspiracy theory."
European
voters, on the other hand, are much more familiar with the terms of the
new agreements. Dutch and French voters rejected the European Constitution
because of its basis in the supremacy of communitarian law. With a rare
openness regarding the controversy, James Kanter reported in the International
Herald Tribune on Sunday, January 1, 2006 that, "There are some tendencies
within the European Union that can be seen with critical eyes," he said,
notably "an extension of communitarian law by the European court." (
From Austria, 'new thoughts' for EU)
Besides
CAFTA, many other "soft" communitarian legal agreements have been made
between U.S. officials with international and supranational organizations.
The U.S. has been governed by communitarian laws for decades. Communitarian
legislation is before every legislative body in the country. Readers who've
been studying the meaning of Sustainable Development will immediately
recognise the true meaning of communitarian law. Communitarianism puts
the rights of the community "at large" over the rights of the individuals
living in the community. This is the entire foundation for anything communitarian.
Global communitarians came to the U.S. to "shore up the moral, social
and political environment." They came to "balance" American's selfish
individualism (and outdated and dangerous nationalism) against their definition
of the collective good.
Each
member state choosing to join the supra-national organization must modify
their national constitutions to accommodate communitarian principles.
Communitarian Law balances the rights of individuals and nations against
the rights of the "community." It requires nations to make political and
legal internal reforms. Communitarian law integrates nations into the
global communitarian justice system. The term "community," when used by
global communitarians, can define everything from smallest rural area
to the entire region, as in the "European Community." Today the EU Communitarian
Court is used as the model for all regional trade agreements in the works.
The
United Nations is also based entirely in the supremacy of communitarian
law. Communitarian law supports the mandates for sustainable and smart
growth principles established in UN Local Agenda 21. Besides the communitarian
supremacy of CAFTA and in other proposals for a North American Free Trade
Agreement, there are also plans to create a communitarian code of justice
for the Middle East.
Communitarian
Community based Development is the structure for implementing the new
system of law. Bush called it Re-Building Community when he explained
the new War on Terror in February 2002, and he wasn't kidding. The idea
for re-building every community in the world under the control of a powerful
community government is well underway in every nation. It's being violently
exported to Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq and discussions have begun to
export the law into the entire Middle East. It's being quietly adopted
by local stakeholder councils across the U.S. Everywhere, from Mexico
to Peru, Serbia to Malaysia, the Philippines to Russia, China to the UK,
the EU to Central America, all are in the process of subordinating national
law under regional communitarian authority. No place in the entire world
has been left behind.
The
original American system, now much denigrated and ridiculed, was based
entirely in the idea of protecting local markets from imperialist monopolies.
When we "threw out the British," we threw out their banker's control over
our trade, production and land. The U.S. federal government was later
designed to protect our national borders from continual imperialist invasions.
It was authorized to regulate trade and commerce between the free and
independent states and to establish a national bank to coin American
money. The bank had private investors but it was regulated by officials
in the U.S. Government, who were responsible to the states. The first
bank funded state banks who provided loans to build a transportation infrastructure,
and it made small loans to small businessmen and cottage industries along
the routes.
The
plan was to make the U.S. entirely self-sustaining both economically and
politically. We were working toward a balance between agriculture and
industry, whereas after achieving it we would slowly begin to engage in
foreign trade with equals. During those years, before taxes, the
U.S. built up a huge surplus in the U.S. Treasury. The American national
system worked so well here it was copied by almost every imperial colony
during the first half of the 19th century. (The early 1800s could be described
as the "Declaration of Independence" Days.) But that didn't last long
before the international bankers were back in control of everybody's land.
Now
we have the private corporations called the World Bank and the Federal
Reserve. We have a progressive tax and an unfathomable national debt.
Today the "idea" of a national system or a national bank is ridiculed
as a capitalist, elitist idea. Protected trade and tariffs are regarded
as selfish, anti-human sentiments. Individual rights are really just a
barrier to peace and social justice. Private land is ecologically unsustainable.
The communitarian banker's plan is more "fair," or you're an uneducated
buffoon.
Here's
how communitarian rulings create a new quality of life:
"Adams offered
an illuminating example of the questions arising from the interaction
between European institutions on the one hand and society at large on
the other. Only keen observers of communitarian matters are aware that
the European Court of Justice has been an active policy maker, in a
role similar to that played by the U.S. Supreme Court after World War
II. By enforcing on individual countries, sectors and firms the laws
approved at the level of the European Community (now Union), the Court
has profoundly affected long-standing national practices.
In the exemplary
case chosen by Adams, the German beer market, regulated since the Middle
Ages by strict purity laws, was suddenly thrown open to producers following
looser practices. As typical of judicial decisions, the Court was not
concerned with the question of what rules ensured the production of
the best beer (provided no harm to consumers would ensue, of course);
it merely weighed different legal principles against one another. The
Court thus decided that the principle of free movement of goods and
services in Europe trumped local German norms, because these de facto
created a protected market for German producers." The
Euro: A New Currency for a New Millennium By Daniela Gobetti.
None
of this is new. The European Commission tells us their Communitarian Court
of Justice has established communitarian environmental case law precedent
since 1957. Legal permission from the locally elected officials for enforcing
new laws in rebuilt sustainable communities is almost always granted.
It's the rare Smart Growth Plan in the United States that wasn't unanimously
passed by states, counties and municipalities. Communitarian environmental
law was the first major breakthrough back in the 1970s. By the 1990s every
state in the U.S. had jumped on the bandwagon.
Communitarian
environmental laws are supreme to any national law or individual right
that conflicts with the collective rights of the member states included
in supranational organizations. Regional justice centers have replaced
City Halls and County Courts. Administrative Hearing and Review Boards
replaced constitutional courts altogether. (Try to use the Bill of Rights
to get your driver's license back from the DMV.) Revised zoning violations
and public nuisance abatements are used by government and NGO partners
to assume control over private land. Eminent domain has been expanded
to include "best use" policies. All American cities, towns, and rural
areas have the exact same new Community Development agencies; they enforce
all the exact same new communitarian laws.
United
Nations Local Agenda 21 was adopted just before Clinton took office. The
U.N. sponsored Bruntland Commission defined the new way to explain the
principles of a communitarian system; communitarian law came to be defined
as "sustainable development." It mimicked Marxism's motto of "each according
to their need, each according to their ability." UN Sustainable Development
means to protect all resources for future generations and make everyone
in the present quit making anything useful or productive that comes out
of the earth. The whole theory is based on the idea that humans kill the
planet by using its resources. [Must see video: Liberty
or Sustainable Development]
Communitarians
promote a thing called human rights, a theory of justice which is totally
the opposite of individual rights. Individual rights are what the U.S.
Bill of Rights was established to protect. Human Rights covers every aspect
of human suffering and death. Unlike clear laws that protect individual
liberty, Human Rights can only be enforced by a supreme global communitarian
legal system. What Americans really don't understand is that ultimately,
Human Rights includes the Marxist mandates for confiscation and "equal"
distribution of private property and goods. In the logic of the globalists,
individual rights to protect yourself, your property, and the freedom
to choose ones' own life path, are ancient, outdated barriers to global
peace and justice. Does it matter to Americans (or Iraqis) if individual
rights are being criminalized under communitarian laws?
Community
Development agencies partnered with Community Policing in almost every
American community. Many towns have a whole lot more COPS on the beat
now. The new cops prevent crime before it happens and their new job includes
helping rebuild livable communities. This is why new COPS walk right in
people's private homes all the time without knocking or wasting time getting
a legal search warrant. Modern cops are part of action teams who write
innovative communitarian laws. Modern COPS can require our citizens show
ID (Hiibel v. State of Nevada). Communitarian COPS visit nosey
neighbors and gather "anecdotal information" that may indicate who's a
"problem."
In the
communitarianized U.S., former KGB spies and Mossad assassins train cops
to use high-powered technology. Some COPS are military snipers. Cops wear
bullet proof vests all the time now. New COPS have fifty nifty new gadgets
hanging all over their uniforms (while our troops in Iraq send home for
12 gauge shotguns). And, in a major shift in American public policy regulations,
communitarian COPS sit on "citizen" committees. New cops help rewrite
local zoning regulations to incorporate communitarian laws. Actually,
the COPS help suggest the problems. Then they suggest new ways to get
around the individual rights of the problem people, rights which are too
strongly guaranteed by a binding legal contract called the U.S. Constitution.
They write the exact same laws in every community in America to address
the exact same locally identified, citizen suggested problems. They call
it holistic, local, grass roots, "participatory democracy" in action.
COPS
are trained to stalk and patrol targeted neighborhoods. More and more
neighborhoods in the U.S. are ghost towns at night. It's creepy to drive
through neighborhoods where the only cars are cops who play cat and mouse
games. COPS keep computer logs of patrons at local watering hubs, and
the statistics on Americans who've been arrested by them for DUIs is astounding.
Our President has openly admitted to have ordered illegal surveillance
on private citizens. This is communitarian "law" in action. Communitarian
data-gathering requirements are now part of every state driver's licensing
agency. Our private information is being cross-referenced with data gathered
from our family members, work associates, and our friendly, patriotic
neighbors. Our private communications, via phone and our personal and
work computers, on and off the internet, are all being monitored in the
name of community security. Does it matter that the justification for
this is communitarianism?
Now
you must ask yourself. Can this possibly be true? This is a big revelation.
It's much too important to come from a nobody. Something so fantastic
would never be left to the small-time, rank-and-file, American home based
researcher. Grassroots is only a good word when it applies to community
plans, not to opposition research. This should be a New York
Times or a Washington Post story. Who the hell is the ACL?
I wish I could list off all my degrees and Ph.ds, but the fact is we have
no credentials, none, what-so-ever. We're just two freedom loving American
women who asked the wrong questions at the right time. You've gotta figure
that if this article were factual and verifiable, obviously, somebody
much more credible would have broke the story a long time ago. But they
didn't, did they? "CAFTA eliminates the U.S. Constitution!" was never
headline news, was it? And now, maybe you're just a little curious.
Once
you verify our sources and confirm the existence of communitarian law,
you've got to ask yourself the only thing that matters anymore. Why? Why
didn't your schools or your elected officials or your TV news stations
or your newspapers publicly explain U.S. integration into a communitarian
juridical system? The U.S. has been integrating communitarian legal principles
for several decades, and what's obvious to us is, the last thing
the plotters want is for you to identify how they're doing it.
What
would happen if Americans began identifying communitarian laws and programs
AS communitarian? What happens when our citizens question the authority
of communitarian law in the United States? Would it make any difference
if Americans were able to recognise and therefore legally disobey
communitarian laws and programs? And, not that it will ever happen, but
could it have any affect on the elections this November if U.S. voters
were pre-informed of the proposed Andean Parliment? I can't help but wonder
about the depth and layers to this entire Hegelian ruse. Sponsored by
Republicans who support "free trade," CAFTA passed with just enough
votes to get it through. Only a thorough understanding of the Hegelian
dialectic explains why our most committed communitarian senators and representatives
vote against it.
PageTOP ^
Disclaimer
Local Zionism - The Communitarian Cancer
Local Zionism - The Communitarian Cancer
by Niki Raapana 12-8-6
Our once healthy nation is now very, very sick. We've
caught a deadly, silent virus, called communitarianism. Nations that have
not immunized their citizens against dialectical communitarianism won't
survive the world plague. If it's not stopped in time, the communitarian
disease will destroy every healthy human in its destructive path. Every
free and independent nation's survival depends on every citizen getting
immunized or treated for exposure, ASAP. While there are few good paths
to full recovery, one of the best unknown cures for the spreading infection
of communitarian poison is a heavy dose of anti-dialectical exposure.
This virus slowly destroys each citizen's capacity to
remember their human survival instincts and the reason people formed tribes,
nations, alliances and unions in the first place. Sold to the public as
the antidote to "full-blown-fear," it causes severe depression,
anxiety, self-destructivness, and very short attention spans. Mass individual
confusion is the result of the four primary symptoms.
Toxic communitarian victims focus primarily on self-gratification
and personal pleasures; this keeps them from having to think (which now
hurts) about their confusion. Like AIDS and cancer, communitarian symptoms
cannot always be seen by the naked eye in the early stages. Infected people
can easily appear completely healthy and "normal" on the outside.
The virus distorts reality in such a way that abnormal human concessions
to slavery and servitude are common. The communitarian infection attacks
the intellect, the spirit, and the body, all at once. It appeals to the
most gullible first. It begins invading its host by slowing numbing the
thinking capacity of the victim.
Benign physical hosts carry the infections to the unaware
pleasure-seekers; television, magazines, videos, movies, cartoons, newspapers,
syringes, straws, pipes, and websites continually repeat (and repeat) mind-numbing,
dialectical persuasion. After a while, the infection takes permanent hold
over the mind, usually when users begin to believe (not think) that they
can trust infected, sick communitarians to ensure their personal survival.
Evolved signs of full-blown communitarianism are: confusing delusions of
grandeur, self-worship, arrogance, cruelty, racism, supremicism, elitism,
greed, and bragging. Publically advertising communitarians as more moral
is also a late sign of infection.
The earliest unrecognized communitarian infections began
in London when the British lost control over the American market. All aristocrats
were stripped of their lands and titles after the war. All Imperial property
holdings were claimed by the upstart colonials. The new virus was created
to poison the concrete system that promised freedom to common born men.
The "new" virus soon spread into all the "best" imperial
universities in the world. Highly educated, infected social scientists
designed the ways to spread the silent but deadly poison. Year after year,
Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Berekley, Univeristy of Chicago, and
universities around the world spread the virus to their students. Their
schools spit out infected teachers, they, in their turn, spewed communitarian
vomit over every student they went on to teach.
For over a century communitarian academic elites have
been rewriting U.S. and World history. But U.S. history cannot honestly
be reduced to ideological theories created by infected communitarian "thinkers."
Our history can't be defined as a "struggle" between individualism
and the "collective good." There was no such "struggle"
when the United States became a nation. The American struggle was between
common born men and Imperialist aristocrats. Ours was a war for economic
independence from the British Empire.
The U.S. Constitution is the structure for a revolving
government body answerable to the individuals whom they represent. It separates
government powers between several branches at every level, with no one
branch having more power than any another. The states are the seat of power.
The national government was established to ensure the Rights of the state
citizens. This "separation of power" formation was to keep public
servants wary, alert, and watching each other for signs of despotic, maniacal,
elitist, aristocratic criminal behaviors.
The First Ten Amendments were added to the structure
by the state representatives sent to the Constitutional Convention, whose
constituents back home did not trust the central government's potential
for taking power away from state protected individuals. The Bill of Rights
were ten simple laws specifically designed to protect individuals and their
private property from the newly formed federal government. Period.
The Rights of the Individual, which are the very foundation
for constitutional government in the United States, are being slowly eliminated
under vague justice theories that protect the "community." Communitarian
Law, Programs, and Policy Studies are taught in all American universities.
We have already become a communitarian nation. While our public schools
teach our children their new communitarian requirements for global citizenship,
the majority of adult American citizens have no idea what this means.
Communitarianism is an ancient, repressive, social-political
theory. It re-emerged in Israel in the 1940s under the guidance of the
Marxist-Hassidic philosopher Martin Buber. The founder of the American
Communitarian Network was an early student of Buber's in Jerusalem. Their
logical formula for worldwide corporate-military leadership supports the
(now standard) practice of replacing national law with international law.
In less than fifty years, global communitarianism replaced every other
justice theory in the world. Today, every country in the world is undergoing
a "wrenching transformation" into a sub-state, under a sub-regional,
"supra-national" organization.
Social theorists claim that human society is only being
"helped" into naturally evolving into planned communitarian sub-regions.
Political and Religious Experts (and Communitarian "gurus") tell
us this is the highest evolutionary progression mankind will ever make.
It's a giant leap forward, it takes a great deal of faith in mysticism
and magic, and only a few special people are so evolved they understand
it. The new system must therefore be led and staffed by a trained, superior
race of more moral humanitarians (which would be them). Whatever. Whether
the law evolves naturally after an armed invasion or just magically springs
from the same chanelled "entity" across America, the results
are ultimately the same. The end result is the total abolishment of all
national and state constitutional law.
While I do appreciate the ACL being cited as a topic
under Individualism at the Modern History Project, I'm confused. Maybe
I took too big a sip of the anti-dialectical antidote, but I don't trust
this term. What is "individualism, really? The US principles for individual
liberty and freedom for all isn't a vague theory of selfish individuals
taking precedence over the vague moral community. I'm afraid Individualism
is, (in my slightly recovered, albeit still confused mind) merely another
dialectical label used to confuse everybody.
Now I don't have a Ph.D., a Masters, or even a Bachelors
degree, but I'm fairly certain the U.S. Constitution is not some vague,
debatable, theory of "individualism" verus "collectivism."
As far as I know, it's our national law, not our national dilemma. But
even if it is a dialectical conflict, the conflict ended in 1789, and individuals
won. The 1787 draft U.S. Constitution was heavily debated in the thirteen
original state legislatures. Intense public debates raged between common
born men in the states for two full years before it passed, but only after
it included the Bill of Rights. U.S. laws, like "freedom of speech,"
right to bear arms," and "authority of law" were pressed
on the Constitutionalists by the free men in the free former colonies.
Common American people wrote the U.S. Bill of Rights.
The American legal system that was based in the U.S.
Constitution is barely functional anymore. American judges trained in communitarian
colleges and law schools always favor "community rights" over
"individual rights." American attorneys trained in communitarian
colleges and law schools act like they made a sworn, secret pact (with
the ABA founders, in London) to never allow the actual communitarian terms
that define the actual communitarian laws into an American individual's
actual defense against a communitarian regulation.
So Americans like me continue to go into their American
court system charged with communitarian "crimes" while still
believing the court honors the Bill of Rights. Every new communitarian
law that protects the "community" ( i.e. masses of faceless "victims,"
women, children, and humans) drastically eliminates laws that protect specific
individuals who may also be real victims, women, children, and humans.
It allows corporate-state theft of all individuals' property, including
their animals, plants, water, air, land, and anything else they can think
of stealing.
Everybody wants to know who's on top. I don't know who
the leaders are in this vast communitarian conspiracy to overthrow legitimate
governments. The top level is still a murky maze of layers upon layers
that always lead back to London. (The ACL has never taken the global hierarchy
past the ties between the Communitarian Network, the Rothschild's Bank
of England, and the Bilderberg Group.) The "real" leaders may
be hard to find and almost impossible to pin down, but believe us, once
you get started, that won't matter so much anymore. Recognizing who's running
the bottom tier opens up the local players (some of whom we personally
know and have voted into office). Every local area, from forest to farm
to town to city to county to state, is being transformed into a communitarian
neighborhood, by local communitarians.
Just like the original American system, there is an entire
political and legal structure for the emerging government. It's fully documented
at every local, regional and international level. Yet, many "infected"
people continue to insist Communitarian Plans and Laws are a "conspiracy
theory." Doesn't it seem a little odd that while communitarian policies
and laws have been implemented in the USA for several decades, every American
attorney refuses to even whisper the real charges to their clients? Shhhhh.
There is a major taboo against average Americans studying or discussing
American Communitarian Law. Only the communitarians are allowed to understand
exactly how (and why) their vague new laws have any authority of law, anywhere,
or just exactly how these anti-constitutional laws came to be so blatantly
applied in the United States.
The main purpose for a communitarian system is to protect
the economic interests of a small group of corporate elites who aim to
control the global market. Communitarians suggest "ideas" for
eliminating American laws that have been identified as barriers to global
expansionism and a new form of nicer slavery. (The entire Bill of Rights
is an "identified barrier.") Communitarians, not the Arabs, are
the people who most "hate our freedoms." Their emptied brains
never challenge the core communitarian idea that freedom for individuals
is passe.
Communitarianism ia a political system that seizes all
property and people for the "good of the community." The theory
is not part of the first two components of a dialectical conflict, it is
the final solution to every conflict. It's neither capitalist nor communist.
It's neither right nor left. It's always somewhere vaugely in the "middle,"
smugly posing an innovative solution to every two or more opposing ideologies.
Communitarianism is the basis for every new science, law, theory, program,
policy, war, and agenda that finds a purpose for balancing individual rights
against the rights of the "global-to-local community."
American education teaches only the "official version"
of communitarian theory, values, and Global Supremecy. Many corporations
and colleges certify their brightest students in communitarian facilitator
and management skills. It's as if it's so perfect and brilliant it creates
no worthy opposition. In fact, the final communitarian solution to the
Marxist dialectic is supposed to be so perfect it gives rise to no opposition.
That's why the ACL Manifesto begins with a short note explaining why our
ACL Hegel page "cannot exist."
While most of the American population remains buried
in dialectical opposition to themselves, the communitarian agenda marches
by largely unnoticed. Our website seems to attract the folks who are looking
past the Looking Glass, they've quit following the rabbit down the hole.
They can see past propaganda even if they start out like we did, by looking
at the emerging agenda with eyes wide open, and wondering why the heck
they never heard of any of this before. We are humbled by the number of
people who have found some answers at the ACL.
Niki Raapana is the co-founder of the Anti-Communitarian
League (ACL), an online research center for studying outside the box.
Niki is also the recent author of the non-fiction biography,
2020. Unlike the ACL website (which is a massive endeavor) 2020 introduces
the global community government in 100-pages using laymen's terms for average
readers. Price: $20.00, includes S&H. Send check or money order to:
Nordica Friedrich-2020, P.O. Box 231941, Anchorage, Alaska, 99523 or order
online using PayPal at the ACL: http://nord.twu.net/acl
nikiraapana@gmail.com
PageTOP ^
Disclaimer
