Chazzsongs - Communitarian Law

Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Português | 日本語 | 한국어 | 汉语­




by Nancy Levant - January 2, 2007 -

Let us start with the premise the title offers. Let us assume that our Constitution and three branches of government, our state constitutions and governors, our schools and universities, our health care systems, taxation systems, all regional and appointed governing bodies, commissions, and councils; our churches and synagogues, our military, land and watershed systems, and all forms of licensure and credentialing, including travel, are under the governing auspices of internationally emerging laws. Then let us try to figure out what is not under global dictatorship specifically here in the United States.

We still have our 2nd Amendment intact, though it has been degraded decade by decade, and the United Nations is in the planning stages of disarming the “international community.” By “international community,” let us assume that means the international rabble. I’m pretty sure the elite will still have their armed body-guarding details and that the “international” peacekeeping forces will remain technologically armed to the teeth and into outer space. Let us also assume that non-lethal weapons technologies will also remain highly funded and manufactured. Let us therefore assume that total disarmament of other than elites and militaries remains a global governing plan of action. In other words, our 2nd Amendment is hanging on by a shred of a thread.

Let us also assume that all current and pending legislation is of Communitarian flavor and has been since the early 1970’s. Communitarian law functions in Europe as the governmental structure and bureaucracy of the European Union. As the North American Union continues to materialize not so secretly, we can also assume that Communitarian law is also intended to replace Constitutional law. One-world government, after all, means ONE government.

From Niki Raapana’s essay titled: What is Communitarian Law?, the following quote:

Communitarian Law is the new legal system used by regional and local governments affiliated with the emerging global government. This new law circumvents national law via a program of "balancing," often implemented by a small group of self-appointed elites who achieve consensus (not voting). For Americans, the adoption of these evolving principles transports us from a constitutional system where we expect clearly defined basic rights (like due process and legal searches) to a more moral way of enforcing "social justice" that only a few upper level academics can define. Communitarian law is the precedent that requires the courts to rule in favor of the self-defined "community" against individuals protected by constitutional law. It limits the property rights of individuals in all member nations. The most obvious current communitarian decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court is Kelo v. The City of New London, a land rights case that balanced property rights against communitarian development goals. The least obvious communitarian decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court is Hiibel v. The State of Nevada, a privacy rights case that balanced private individual's right to anonymity. In all U.S. communitarian legislation and criminal code, the stated purpose is to balance individual rights against community responsibilities. It's called Reinventing Government. Based on the consensus reached by globalist do-gooders, all nations are now required to adjust their national systems. The world is in an ongoing process of internal re-inventions of national political and legal infrastructures.”

Also from Niki Raapana:

“Communitarian Law is a top-down system:

  1. International Communitarian Law, enforced by international courts of justice.

  2. Regional Communitarian Law, enforced by regional parliaments.

  3. Local Communitarian Law, enforced by Community Development Public-Private Partnerships and LA-21 Plans.

The communitarian philosophy-ideology is what supports the emerging supranational government body. The system integrates all nations of the world into sub-regions. Each region has its own code of communitarian law in addition to mandatory inclusion of higher global laws. Each nation has their own proposed process for national subordination to the regional and international supreme authoritative bodies. In Europe and Latin America the national modification and subordination process is published in all documents relating to communitarian integration. In Europe they have a collection of communitarian environmental case law (with E Law being one of the first global scale tests of the new law). In the United States it can never be disclosed to the average voter; for officials to speak openly of treason is a criminal offense (”

It is increasingly difficult to explain to a refusing public the truth about America’s future and demise. I make the strongest recommendation to fully explore the Anti-Communitarian League website offered above. To understand what has happened in the U.S., as well as to the rest of the world, one must understand the replacement government that has been implemented by the global or one-world system. To even begin to fathom America coming under the governmental control of another court and system of justice, one must fully comprehend the fact that 1) this new form of government exists and operates in many other parts of the world as we speak, and 2) it has already been illegally implemented on the homeland. We the people are NOT driving the wagon – period. And, remarkably, we still don’t realize that this new government is operational in every state in this nation (see “Regional” government).

Communitarian Law is not a conspiracy theory. It is practiced and taught in most law schools in Europe as the primary system of governance. Communitarian Law is also an operational fact of daily life in the U.S.

And the bottom line is this: Communitarian Law eliminates ALL rights of individuals for 1) the common good, and 2) for the “security” of the global governing elite - nothing more – nothing less. It sets up a 2-class system of governors and the governed, or in simplified terms, the rich overlords and the rabble. Communitarianism is high-tech Communism.

Consider ourselves lucky to be living in the most frightening and fascinating time in American history. We are experiencing the exact moment in time where America stands or permanently falls to pure and unadulterated treason and betrayal by the elected. With a whole lot of us and a smidgeon of them, we have to make the determination as to the kind of lives we choose to live. Today, and as we speak, you must decided for yourselves if you want freedom or to be totally, 100% controlled and managed people. A middle ground does not exist. It’s all for freedom or all for one-world governance by elimination of ALL individual (meaning constitutional) rights.

So, here is what we are free to do. Tell the truth, expect the truth, and stand up for freedom for mankind. Hurry, America. In one voice, the American people must scream to Washington D.C. and to their state capitols that we will not stand by and allow our freedom and our sovereign nation to fall to THEIR custom-made, hand-crafted technological government. We must defend our constitutional rights and our nation. Communitarianism is not about “the common good,” people. It’s about power and the absolute and dictatorial control of money and people – nothing more and nothing less. America’s future and continuing history falls on our shoulders. WE have to tell the traitors in office “NO” before the next “crisis” strikes our nation. Once martial law is declared, the “new world” begins in earnest, and it is highly unlikely that American troops will be here to enforce martial law. Clearly, “peacekeeping” forces will have to be deployed to our homeland, as our military is clearly not coming home. You better wake up, America. We are running out of words to help you to see reality. We are also running out of time.

PageTOP ^


Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Português | 日本語 | 한국어 | 汉语­



by Niki Raapana

January 25, 2006 -

How both parties sold America down the river

After wading through all the publications and websites representing both support and opposition for the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-approved by the U.S. Congress July 2005), it's astonishing to realize how very few of them bother to explain the legal foundation for the agreement. CAFTA, like most international trade agreements, is based entirely in the supremacy of communitarian law.

This isn't Bush and Clinton quietly slipping in communitarian programs like Local Agenda 21 that bury communitarian laws deep inside hefty grants and incentives. The U.S. Congress has officially denounced their own Constitution as Supreme Law. When the United States Congress approved CAFTA they endorsed a regional trade agreement that places U.S. Constitutional Law below Communitarian Law. While communitarian law is without a doubt the most important legal topic in the world, American experts on both "sides" of the free trade arguments completely ignore it. Consequently, it's the rare American who has any concept of how prevalent or powerful this new system of justice is.

The European Court of Justice is occassionally referred to as the Communitarian Court of Justice. CAFTA officials openly discuss using the EU as their model for communitarian case law. Communitarian Regulations govern the archiving of EU legal documents. The term communitarian law is in hundreds of online law journals. It's taught in several foreign law schools and there are degreed law professors of Communitarian Law. The Jean Monet program sponsors symposiums on it at U.S. universities. The D.C. Communitarian Network sends out a communitarian law newsletter. It's a widely understood term in Europe, Central, and South America. Still, Communitarian Law is so unfamiliar to U.S. Americans (and their attorneys) that most have never once heard the terms used.

One reason for its obscurity comes from the fact that communitarian law is also called Community Law, community aquis, and aquis communitaire. But another reason for its obscurity is the simple fact that globalists don't want our people to know anything about it. The European Constitution was defeated at the polls by the Dutch and the French voters because of its supremacy of communitarian law. The last thing the communitarian supra-nationalists want to happen is for all of America to learn the whole truth about communitarian "free trade." Remember, universities in England, Spain, Portugal, and Romania offer coursework and masters programs in Communitarian Law. Only a few elite American universities offer courses in communitarian law, and barely a handful of American students have ever studied it.

The vice-president of the EU Constitutional Convention sums it up nicely:

"One must act 'as if' in Europe: as if one wanted only very few things, in order to obtain a great deal. As if nations were to remain sovereign, in order to convince them to surrender their sovereignty. The Commission in Brussels, for example, must act as if it were a technical organism, in order to operate like a government ... and so on, camouflaging and toning down. The sovereignty lost at national level does not pass to any new subject. It is entrusted to a faceless entity: NATO, the UN and eventually the EU. The Union is the vanguard of this changing world: it indicates a future of Princes without sovereignty. The new entity is faceless and those who are in command can neither be pinned down nor elected ... That is the way Europe was made too: by creating communitarian organisms without giving the organisms presided over by national governments the impression that they were being subjected to a higher power.

That is how the Court of Justice as a supra-national organ was born. It was a sort of unseen atom bomb, which Schuman and Monnet slipped into the negotiations on the Coal and Steel Community. That was what the 'CSC' itself was: a random mixture of national egotisms which became communitarian. I don't think it is a good idea to replace this slow and effective method - which keeps national States free from anxiety while they are being stripped of power - with great institutional leaps - Therefore I prefer to go slowly, to crumble pieces of sovereignty up litle by little, avoiding brusque transitions from national to federal power. That is the way I think we will have to build Europe's common policies..."

- Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato, later Vice-President of the EU Constitutional Convention, interview with Barbara Spinelli, La Stampa, 13 July 2000. Posted in a great list of quotes compiled by Free Europe Blog.

How is it possible that Americans, with their "free press" and literate population are completely unfamiliar with the term communitarian law? The problem appears to be a constitutional issue over the definition of treason. Communitarian law is designed to over-rule all national law, including the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Why do so many Americans flat out refuse to consider the possibility that current events resulting in federal legislation and Executive Orders are related? Communitarian laws balance individual rights against "safety" (as do the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act). This shows a pattern of thought, doesn't it? Part of the problem is the American people don't believe there are any more Hitlers or Stalins.

They believe communism "died" in the eighties, and that former evil colonial rulers all magically, spiritually evolved into nice, kind "helpers." This amazing under-education promotes such a naive approach to modern politics that admitting the unknown is almost impossible for them. Indeed, many prefer to "shoot the messenger" rather than admit they somehow missed the most important legal development of the 20th century. The fact is, communitarian law and philosophy are so well hidden from the American people that many have accused this author of making the terms up as a part of my own personal "conspiracy theory."

European voters, on the other hand, are much more familiar with the terms of the new agreements. Dutch and French voters rejected the European Constitution because of its basis in the supremacy of communitarian law. With a rare openness regarding the controversy, James Kanter reported in the International Herald Tribune on Sunday, January 1, 2006 that, "There are some tendencies within the European Union that can be seen with critical eyes," he said, notably "an extension of communitarian law by the European court." ( From Austria, 'new thoughts' for EU)

Besides CAFTA, many other "soft" communitarian legal agreements have been made between U.S. officials with international and supranational organizations. The U.S. has been governed by communitarian laws for decades. Communitarian legislation is before every legislative body in the country. Readers who've been studying the meaning of Sustainable Development will immediately recognise the true meaning of communitarian law. Communitarianism puts the rights of the community "at large" over the rights of the individuals living in the community. This is the entire foundation for anything communitarian. Global communitarians came to the U.S. to "shore up the moral, social and political environment." They came to "balance" American's selfish individualism (and outdated and dangerous nationalism) against their definition of the collective good.

Each member state choosing to join the supra-national organization must modify their national constitutions to accommodate communitarian principles. Communitarian Law balances the rights of individuals and nations against the rights of the "community." It requires nations to make political and legal internal reforms. Communitarian law integrates nations into the global communitarian justice system. The term "community," when used by global communitarians, can define everything from smallest rural area to the entire region, as in the "European Community." Today the EU Communitarian Court is used as the model for all regional trade agreements in the works.

The United Nations is also based entirely in the supremacy of communitarian law. Communitarian law supports the mandates for sustainable and smart growth principles established in UN Local Agenda 21. Besides the communitarian supremacy of CAFTA and in other proposals for a North American Free Trade Agreement, there are also plans to create a communitarian code of justice for the Middle East.

Communitarian Community based Development is the structure for implementing the new system of law. Bush called it Re-Building Community when he explained the new War on Terror in February 2002, and he wasn't kidding. The idea for re-building every community in the world under the control of a powerful community government is well underway in every nation. It's being violently exported to Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq and discussions have begun to export the law into the entire Middle East. It's being quietly adopted by local stakeholder councils across the U.S. Everywhere, from Mexico to Peru, Serbia to Malaysia, the Philippines to Russia, China to the UK, the EU to Central America, all are in the process of subordinating national law under regional communitarian authority. No place in the entire world has been left behind.

The original American system, now much denigrated and ridiculed, was based entirely in the idea of protecting local markets from imperialist monopolies. When we "threw out the British," we threw out their banker's control over our trade, production and land. The U.S. federal government was later designed to protect our national borders from continual imperialist invasions. It was authorized to regulate trade and commerce between the free and independent states and to establish a national bank to coin American money. The bank had private investors but it was regulated by officials in the U.S. Government, who were responsible to the states. The first bank funded state banks who provided loans to build a transportation infrastructure, and it made small loans to small businessmen and cottage industries along the routes.

The plan was to make the U.S. entirely self-sustaining both economically and politically. We were working toward a balance between agriculture and industry, whereas after achieving it we would slowly begin to engage in foreign trade with equals. During those years, before taxes, the U.S. built up a huge surplus in the U.S. Treasury. The American national system worked so well here it was copied by almost every imperial colony during the first half of the 19th century. (The early 1800s could be described as the "Declaration of Independence" Days.) But that didn't last long before the international bankers were back in control of everybody's land.

Now we have the private corporations called the World Bank and the Federal Reserve. We have a progressive tax and an unfathomable national debt. Today the "idea" of a national system or a national bank is ridiculed as a capitalist, elitist idea. Protected trade and tariffs are regarded as selfish, anti-human sentiments. Individual rights are really just a barrier to peace and social justice. Private land is ecologically unsustainable. The communitarian banker's plan is more "fair," or you're an uneducated buffoon.

Here's how communitarian rulings create a new quality of life:

"Adams offered an illuminating example of the questions arising from the interaction between European institutions on the one hand and society at large on the other. Only keen observers of communitarian matters are aware that the European Court of Justice has been an active policy maker, in a role similar to that played by the U.S. Supreme Court after World War II. By enforcing on individual countries, sectors and firms the laws approved at the level of the European Community (now Union), the Court has profoundly affected long-standing national practices.

In the exemplary case chosen by Adams, the German beer market, regulated since the Middle Ages by strict purity laws, was suddenly thrown open to producers following looser practices. As typical of judicial decisions, the Court was not concerned with the question of what rules ensured the production of the best beer (provided no harm to consumers would ensue, of course); it merely weighed different legal principles against one another. The Court thus decided that the principle of free movement of goods and services in Europe trumped local German norms, because these de facto created a protected market for German producers." The Euro: A New Currency for a New Millennium By Daniela Gobetti.

None of this is new. The European Commission tells us their Communitarian Court of Justice has established communitarian environmental case law precedent since 1957. Legal permission from the locally elected officials for enforcing new laws in rebuilt sustainable communities is almost always granted. It's the rare Smart Growth Plan in the United States that wasn't unanimously passed by states, counties and municipalities. Communitarian environmental law was the first major breakthrough back in the 1970s. By the 1990s every state in the U.S. had jumped on the bandwagon.

Communitarian environmental laws are supreme to any national law or individual right that conflicts with the collective rights of the member states included in supranational organizations. Regional justice centers have replaced City Halls and County Courts. Administrative Hearing and Review Boards replaced constitutional courts altogether. (Try to use the Bill of Rights to get your driver's license back from the DMV.) Revised zoning violations and public nuisance abatements are used by government and NGO partners to assume control over private land. Eminent domain has been expanded to include "best use" policies. All American cities, towns, and rural areas have the exact same new Community Development agencies; they enforce all the exact same new communitarian laws.

United Nations Local Agenda 21 was adopted just before Clinton took office. The U.N. sponsored Bruntland Commission defined the new way to explain the principles of a communitarian system; communitarian law came to be defined as "sustainable development." It mimicked Marxism's motto of "each according to their need, each according to their ability." UN Sustainable Development means to protect all resources for future generations and make everyone in the present quit making anything useful or productive that comes out of the earth. The whole theory is based on the idea that humans kill the planet by using its resources. [Must see video: Liberty or Sustainable Development]

Communitarians promote a thing called human rights, a theory of justice which is totally the opposite of individual rights. Individual rights are what the U.S. Bill of Rights was established to protect. Human Rights covers every aspect of human suffering and death. Unlike clear laws that protect individual liberty, Human Rights can only be enforced by a supreme global communitarian legal system. What Americans really don't understand is that ultimately, Human Rights includes the Marxist mandates for confiscation and "equal" distribution of private property and goods. In the logic of the globalists, individual rights to protect yourself, your property, and the freedom to choose ones' own life path, are ancient, outdated barriers to global peace and justice. Does it matter to Americans (or Iraqis) if individual rights are being criminalized under communitarian laws?

Community Development agencies partnered with Community Policing in almost every American community. Many towns have a whole lot more COPS on the beat now. The new cops prevent crime before it happens and their new job includes helping rebuild livable communities. This is why new COPS walk right in people's private homes all the time without knocking or wasting time getting a legal search warrant. Modern cops are part of action teams who write innovative communitarian laws. Modern COPS can require our citizens show ID (Hiibel v. State of Nevada). Communitarian COPS visit nosey neighbors and gather "anecdotal information" that may indicate who's a "problem."

In the communitarianized U.S., former KGB spies and Mossad assassins train cops to use high-powered technology. Some COPS are military snipers. Cops wear bullet proof vests all the time now. New COPS have fifty nifty new gadgets hanging all over their uniforms (while our troops in Iraq send home for 12 gauge shotguns). And, in a major shift in American public policy regulations, communitarian COPS sit on "citizen" committees. New cops help rewrite local zoning regulations to incorporate communitarian laws. Actually, the COPS help suggest the problems. Then they suggest new ways to get around the individual rights of the problem people, rights which are too strongly guaranteed by a binding legal contract called the U.S. Constitution. They write the exact same laws in every community in America to address the exact same locally identified, citizen suggested problems. They call it holistic, local, grass roots, "participatory democracy" in action.

COPS are trained to stalk and patrol targeted neighborhoods. More and more neighborhoods in the U.S. are ghost towns at night. It's creepy to drive through neighborhoods where the only cars are cops who play cat and mouse games. COPS keep computer logs of patrons at local watering hubs, and the statistics on Americans who've been arrested by them for DUIs is astounding. Our President has openly admitted to have ordered illegal surveillance on private citizens. This is communitarian "law" in action. Communitarian data-gathering requirements are now part of every state driver's licensing agency. Our private information is being cross-referenced with data gathered from our family members, work associates, and our friendly, patriotic neighbors. Our private communications, via phone and our personal and work computers, on and off the internet, are all being monitored in the name of community security. Does it matter that the justification for this is communitarianism?

Now you must ask yourself. Can this possibly be true? This is a big revelation. It's much too important to come from a nobody. Something so fantastic would never be left to the small-time, rank-and-file, American home based researcher. Grassroots is only a good word when it applies to community plans, not to opposition research. This should be a New York Times or a Washington Post story. Who the hell is the ACL? I wish I could list off all my degrees and Ph.ds, but the fact is we have no credentials, none, what-so-ever. We're just two freedom loving American women who asked the wrong questions at the right time. You've gotta figure that if this article were factual and verifiable, obviously, somebody much more credible would have broke the story a long time ago. But they didn't, did they? "CAFTA eliminates the U.S. Constitution!" was never headline news, was it? And now, maybe you're just a little curious.

Once you verify our sources and confirm the existence of communitarian law, you've got to ask yourself the only thing that matters anymore. Why? Why didn't your schools or your elected officials or your TV news stations or your newspapers publicly explain U.S. integration into a communitarian juridical system? The U.S. has been integrating communitarian legal principles for several decades, and what's obvious to us is, the last thing the plotters want is for you to identify how they're doing it.

What would happen if Americans began identifying communitarian laws and programs AS communitarian? What happens when our citizens question the authority of communitarian law in the United States? Would it make any difference if Americans were able to recognise and therefore legally disobey communitarian laws and programs? And, not that it will ever happen, but could it have any affect on the elections this November if U.S. voters were pre-informed of the proposed Andean Parliment? I can't help but wonder about the depth and layers to this entire Hegelian ruse. Sponsored by Republicans who support "free trade," CAFTA passed with just enough votes to get it through. Only a thorough understanding of the Hegelian dialectic explains why our most committed communitarian senators and representatives vote against it.

PageTOP ^


Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Português | 日本語 | 한국어 | 汉语­

Local Zionism - The Communitarian Cancer

Local Zionism - The Communitarian Cancer

by Niki Raapana 12-8-6

Our once healthy nation is now very, very sick. We've caught a deadly, silent virus, called communitarianism. Nations that have not immunized their citizens against dialectical communitarianism won't survive the world plague. If it's not stopped in time, the communitarian disease will destroy every healthy human in its destructive path. Every free and independent nation's survival depends on every citizen getting immunized or treated for exposure, ASAP. While there are few good paths to full recovery, one of the best unknown cures for the spreading infection of communitarian poison is a heavy dose of anti-dialectical exposure.

This virus slowly destroys each citizen's capacity to remember their human survival instincts and the reason people formed tribes, nations, alliances and unions in the first place. Sold to the public as the antidote to "full-blown-fear," it causes severe depression, anxiety, self-destructivness, and very short attention spans. Mass individual confusion is the result of the four primary symptoms.

Toxic communitarian victims focus primarily on self-gratification and personal pleasures; this keeps them from having to think (which now hurts) about their confusion. Like AIDS and cancer, communitarian symptoms cannot always be seen by the naked eye in the early stages. Infected people can easily appear completely healthy and "normal" on the outside. The virus distorts reality in such a way that abnormal human concessions to slavery and servitude are common. The communitarian infection attacks the intellect, the spirit, and the body, all at once. It appeals to the most gullible first. It begins invading its host by slowing numbing the thinking capacity of the victim.

Benign physical hosts carry the infections to the unaware pleasure-seekers; television, magazines, videos, movies, cartoons, newspapers, syringes, straws, pipes, and websites continually repeat (and repeat) mind-numbing, dialectical persuasion. After a while, the infection takes permanent hold over the mind, usually when users begin to believe (not think) that they can trust infected, sick communitarians to ensure their personal survival. Evolved signs of full-blown communitarianism are: confusing delusions of grandeur, self-worship, arrogance, cruelty, racism, supremicism, elitism, greed, and bragging. Publically advertising communitarians as more moral is also a late sign of infection.

The earliest unrecognized communitarian infections began in London when the British lost control over the American market. All aristocrats were stripped of their lands and titles after the war. All Imperial property holdings were claimed by the upstart colonials. The new virus was created to poison the concrete system that promised freedom to common born men. The "new" virus soon spread into all the "best" imperial universities in the world. Highly educated, infected social scientists designed the ways to spread the silent but deadly poison. Year after year, Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Berekley, Univeristy of Chicago, and universities around the world spread the virus to their students. Their schools spit out infected teachers, they, in their turn, spewed communitarian vomit over every student they went on to teach.

For over a century communitarian academic elites have been rewriting U.S. and World history. But U.S. history cannot honestly be reduced to ideological theories created by infected communitarian "thinkers." Our history can't be defined as a "struggle" between individualism and the "collective good." There was no such "struggle" when the United States became a nation. The American struggle was between common born men and Imperialist aristocrats. Ours was a war for economic independence from the British Empire.

The U.S. Constitution is the structure for a revolving government body answerable to the individuals whom they represent. It separates government powers between several branches at every level, with no one branch having more power than any another. The states are the seat of power. The national government was established to ensure the Rights of the state citizens. This "separation of power" formation was to keep public servants wary, alert, and watching each other for signs of despotic, maniacal, elitist, aristocratic criminal behaviors.

The First Ten Amendments were added to the structure by the state representatives sent to the Constitutional Convention, whose constituents back home did not trust the central government's potential for taking power away from state protected individuals. The Bill of Rights were ten simple laws specifically designed to protect individuals and their private property from the newly formed federal government. Period.

The Rights of the Individual, which are the very foundation for constitutional government in the United States, are being slowly eliminated under vague justice theories that protect the "community." Communitarian Law, Programs, and Policy Studies are taught in all American universities. We have already become a communitarian nation. While our public schools teach our children their new communitarian requirements for global citizenship, the majority of adult American citizens have no idea what this means.

Communitarianism is an ancient, repressive, social-political theory. It re-emerged in Israel in the 1940s under the guidance of the Marxist-Hassidic philosopher Martin Buber. The founder of the American Communitarian Network was an early student of Buber's in Jerusalem. Their logical formula for worldwide corporate-military leadership supports the (now standard) practice of replacing national law with international law. In less than fifty years, global communitarianism replaced every other justice theory in the world. Today, every country in the world is undergoing a "wrenching transformation" into a sub-state, under a sub-regional, "supra-national" organization.

Social theorists claim that human society is only being "helped" into naturally evolving into planned communitarian sub-regions. Political and Religious Experts (and Communitarian "gurus") tell us this is the highest evolutionary progression mankind will ever make. It's a giant leap forward, it takes a great deal of faith in mysticism and magic, and only a few special people are so evolved they understand it. The new system must therefore be led and staffed by a trained, superior race of more moral humanitarians (which would be them). Whatever. Whether the law evolves naturally after an armed invasion or just magically springs from the same chanelled "entity" across America, the results are ultimately the same. The end result is the total abolishment of all national and state constitutional law.

While I do appreciate the ACL being cited as a topic under Individualism at the Modern History Project, I'm confused. Maybe I took too big a sip of the anti-dialectical antidote, but I don't trust this term. What is "individualism, really? The US principles for individual liberty and freedom for all isn't a vague theory of selfish individuals taking precedence over the vague moral community. I'm afraid Individualism is, (in my slightly recovered, albeit still confused mind) merely another dialectical label used to confuse everybody.

Now I don't have a Ph.D., a Masters, or even a Bachelors degree, but I'm fairly certain the U.S. Constitution is not some vague, debatable, theory of "individualism" verus "collectivism." As far as I know, it's our national law, not our national dilemma. But even if it is a dialectical conflict, the conflict ended in 1789, and individuals won. The 1787 draft U.S. Constitution was heavily debated in the thirteen original state legislatures. Intense public debates raged between common born men in the states for two full years before it passed, but only after it included the Bill of Rights. U.S. laws, like "freedom of speech," right to bear arms," and "authority of law" were pressed on the Constitutionalists by the free men in the free former colonies. Common American people wrote the U.S. Bill of Rights.

The American legal system that was based in the U.S. Constitution is barely functional anymore. American judges trained in communitarian colleges and law schools always favor "community rights" over "individual rights." American attorneys trained in communitarian colleges and law schools act like they made a sworn, secret pact (with the ABA founders, in London) to never allow the actual communitarian terms that define the actual communitarian laws into an American individual's actual defense against a communitarian regulation.

So Americans like me continue to go into their American court system charged with communitarian "crimes" while still believing the court honors the Bill of Rights. Every new communitarian law that protects the "community" ( i.e. masses of faceless "victims," women, children, and humans) drastically eliminates laws that protect specific individuals who may also be real victims, women, children, and humans. It allows corporate-state theft of all individuals' property, including their animals, plants, water, air, land, and anything else they can think of stealing.

Everybody wants to know who's on top. I don't know who the leaders are in this vast communitarian conspiracy to overthrow legitimate governments. The top level is still a murky maze of layers upon layers that always lead back to London. (The ACL has never taken the global hierarchy past the ties between the Communitarian Network, the Rothschild's Bank of England, and the Bilderberg Group.) The "real" leaders may be hard to find and almost impossible to pin down, but believe us, once you get started, that won't matter so much anymore. Recognizing who's running the bottom tier opens up the local players (some of whom we personally know and have voted into office). Every local area, from forest to farm to town to city to county to state, is being transformed into a communitarian neighborhood, by local communitarians.

Just like the original American system, there is an entire political and legal structure for the emerging government. It's fully documented at every local, regional and international level. Yet, many "infected" people continue to insist Communitarian Plans and Laws are a "conspiracy theory." Doesn't it seem a little odd that while communitarian policies and laws have been implemented in the USA for several decades, every American attorney refuses to even whisper the real charges to their clients? Shhhhh. There is a major taboo against average Americans studying or discussing American Communitarian Law. Only the communitarians are allowed to understand exactly how (and why) their vague new laws have any authority of law, anywhere, or just exactly how these anti-constitutional laws came to be so blatantly applied in the United States.

The main purpose for a communitarian system is to protect the economic interests of a small group of corporate elites who aim to control the global market. Communitarians suggest "ideas" for eliminating American laws that have been identified as barriers to global expansionism and a new form of nicer slavery. (The entire Bill of Rights is an "identified barrier.") Communitarians, not the Arabs, are the people who most "hate our freedoms." Their emptied brains never challenge the core communitarian idea that freedom for individuals is passe.

Communitarianism ia a political system that seizes all property and people for the "good of the community." The theory is not part of the first two components of a dialectical conflict, it is the final solution to every conflict. It's neither capitalist nor communist. It's neither right nor left. It's always somewhere vaugely in the "middle," smugly posing an innovative solution to every two or more opposing ideologies. Communitarianism is the basis for every new science, law, theory, program, policy, war, and agenda that finds a purpose for balancing individual rights against the rights of the "global-to-local community."

American education teaches only the "official version" of communitarian theory, values, and Global Supremecy. Many corporations and colleges certify their brightest students in communitarian facilitator and management skills. It's as if it's so perfect and brilliant it creates no worthy opposition. In fact, the final communitarian solution to the Marxist dialectic is supposed to be so perfect it gives rise to no opposition. That's why the ACL Manifesto begins with a short note explaining why our ACL Hegel page "cannot exist."

While most of the American population remains buried in dialectical opposition to themselves, the communitarian agenda marches by largely unnoticed. Our website seems to attract the folks who are looking past the Looking Glass, they've quit following the rabbit down the hole. They can see past propaganda even if they start out like we did, by looking at the emerging agenda with eyes wide open, and wondering why the heck they never heard of any of this before. We are humbled by the number of people who have found some answers at the ACL.

Niki Raapana is the co-founder of the Anti-Communitarian League (ACL), an online research center for studying outside the box.

Niki is also the recent author of the non-fiction biography, 2020. Unlike the ACL website (which is a massive endeavor) 2020 introduces the global community government in 100-pages using laymen's terms for average readers. Price: $20.00, includes S&H. Send check or money order to: Nordica Friedrich-2020, P.O. Box 231941, Anchorage, Alaska, 99523 or order online using PayPal at the ACL:

PageTOP ^